Nano Brows vs Microblading
Nano brows and microblading both aim for natural brows, but the technique and wear differ. Here's how to choose based on your skin and goals.
Updated 2026-06-21
General information to help you decide — not professional or medical advice. Consult a qualified professional.
Microblading
Hair strokes drawn by hand with a manual blade for a very natural result.
Pros
- Natural hair-by-hair look
- Great for filling sparse areas
- Immediate result
Cons
- Fades faster on oily skin
- Shorter wear (12–24 months)
- More frequent touch-ups
Best for: Normal-to-dry skin wanting a natural effect
Nano brows
Hair strokes created with a machine using a single ultra-fine needle.
Pros
- Better wear on oily skin
- Very crisp, precise strokes
- Often longer wear (1–3 years)
Cons
- Sometimes higher cost
- Requires an artist skilled with the machine
Best for: Combination-to-oily skin and longer wear
Side-by-side
| Microblading | Nano brows | |
|---|---|---|
| Tool | Manual blade | Machine (single needle) |
| Finish | Natural hairs | Crisp fine hairs |
| Ideal skin | Normal to dry | All, especially oily |
| Longevity | 12–24 months | 1–3 years |
| Discomfort | Mild | Mild |
| Typical price | CA$350–700 | CA$400–800 |
Our recommendation
For oily skin or maximum wear, choose nano brows. For the most natural effect on dry-to-normal skin, microblading is still excellent. When in doubt, book a consultation.
Frequently asked questions
Which lasts longer?
Usually nano brows, especially on oily skin.
Which hurts more?
Both are similar; a numbing cream is used.
Can I switch between them?
Yes, once the previous colour has faded; an artist can advise you.